<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>LooseSuits Thread: Are Facebook Ads Going to Zero? Lookery Lowers Its Guarantee to 7.5-Cent CPMs</title>
<link>http://loosesuits.com/notes/</link>
<description>LooseSuits Thread: Are Facebook Ads Going to Zero? Lookery Lowers Its Guarantee to 7.5-Cent CPMs</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Are Facebook Ads Going to Zero? Lookery Lowers Its Guarantee to 7.5-Cent CPMs</title>
<link>http://loosesuits.com/marketing/notes/15662/p/1/#response-119274</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:34:02</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Scrivs</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">119274</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This doesn't surprise me at all and is a big problem for Facebook. At least Myspace was aware from the beginning what to do to gain revenue and wasn't ashame to just plaster the ads on there. Facebook, while I have respect for what they do, tried to keep it too clean and give targetted ads that just don't pull any weight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With so many pageviews, an advertiser can see their campaign for the month gone in a couple of hours so who would be willing to pay a premium on the CPM rates?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

