http://loosesuits.com/notes/ LooseSuits Thread: Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers en Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:10:58 +0000 http://loosesuits.com/web/notes/434/p/1/#response-3233 Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:43:00 CK 3233 <p>24 is small, is it not? If we were talking a team of 50-odd coders i'd say it is a lot, but i see where you're coming from.</p> <p>Also, millions in the bank...? I'm intrigued. </p> http://loosesuits.com/web/notes/434/p/1/#response-3232 Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:05:48 Scrivs 3232 <p>Small independent endeavor? 24 people is small for one product? Millions in the bank? </p> http://loosesuits.com/web/notes/434/p/1/#response-3188 Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:11:19 CK 3188 <p>Bah, actually had the sense to click the link and read.</p> <p>What's the problem with it being in Beta? So what if the gaffa's stood down? There's still a fair wad of staff tinkering here and there. It's progressing at the speed i expected for a small, independent endeavour.</p> <p>__<br /> CK </p> http://loosesuits.com/web/notes/434/p/1/#response-3186 Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:01:45 CK 3186 <p>Losers in what sense? Poor design; havene't hit off, etc?</p> <p>I happen to like Flock, though, admittedly, i don't use it. I might be changing soon with FF peeing me about.</p> <p>__<br /> CK </p> http://loosesuits.com/web/notes/434/p/1/#response-3165 Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:49:57 Scrivs 3165 <p>Over at <a href="http://wisdump.com/">Wisdump</a>, I have posted a list of the <a href="http://wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/">top 10 Web 2.0 Losers</a>. The list includes:</p> <ol> <li><a href="http://odeo.com/">Odeo</a></li> <li><a href="http://squidoo.com">Squidoo</a></li> <li><a href="http://edgeio.com">Edgeio</a></li> <li><a href="http://flock.com">Flock</a></li> <li><a href="http://netscape.com">Netscape</a></li> <li><a href="http://microsoft.com">Microsoft</a></li> <li><a href="http://aol.com">AOL</a></li> <li><a href="http://bloglines.com">Bloglines</a></li> <li><a href="http://sixapart.com">SixApart</a></li> <li><a href="http://technorati.com">Technorati</a></li> </ol>